Crossing the Chasm - The Future of Fitness Version
A good friend, Robert Dyer, sent me a link to one of the most important documents that's appeared in our industry recently. If you haven't seen it, Les Mills International partnered with the Nielsen Company to publish "The Future of Fitness: A White Paper." It can be found at www.futureoffitnesswhitepaper.com. If you don't have a copy or haven't registered at the web site, you should do so! There is a lot in this paper that needs to be digested by our industry. As I've read over the paper, contemplating the future, I'd like you all to consider a parallel I believe is relevant.
In the technology development, marketing and adoption life cycle, a standard was introduced in 1991 by author Geoffrey Moore in his book"Crossing The Chasm." Moore's work defines a technology product adoption model where new products are purchased initially by "innovators"and "visionaries." This group of enthusiast make up the "early market." As a technology is brought from idea to early market, typically lots of "features" are hung on the product from the advice and feedback of early adopters and are included to create a product that appeals to even more consumers. The challenge is that in Moore's model, lying between the early adopters and the next group, the early majority, a chasm appears. The early adopters are consumers who are described as "enthusiasts" and "visionaries." The next stage, Early Majority are described as "pragmatists. " Even more daunting, the next groups, Late Majority and Laggeds are described as conservatives and skeptics. The kind of thinking that appeals to the early adopters WILL NOT appeal to the Early Majority. But the reward to companies and industries for crossing the chasm is that more than 70% of the market, early and late majority, and laggards, lie on the other side of the chasm. Companies must change the way they think to effectively move from the enthusiast to the larger majority of the market.
On page 2 of the FOFWP three key challenges are identified from the research: 1. How do we remain relevant among the "converted" consumers(read enthusiasts). 2. Can we improve our offer to those who enjoy fitness but don't like going to the gym (pragmatists?). 3. How do we keep the industry fresh, relevant and competitive in the decades ahead..." On page 1 the authors point out that "17% of adults belong to health clubs in any single country, and market penetration of10.5% is enough to be among the top ten of all countries." When you look at this data graphically, our industry is in the "early adopter" stage of the life cycle model. It seems that we're peering over a chasm at the majority of our potential customers. Trying to light a rocket under the same thinking that brought us to this point won't be enough to get us across. Fitness providers have to change the way they think!
What do the following have in common? Golds Gym and Apple? YMCA and Google? Personal Trainers and Technology Enthusiasts? Jocks and Geeks? Until now, they've had very little in common only appearing together as ends of a comparative spectrum. But our industry is dominated by brands who cater to early adopters like jocks, personal trainers and fitness enthusiast. To date we've felt progressive stuffing some basic off-the-shelf consumer technology into our current offerings. I call that putting lipstick on a pig. As we examine our futures, we need to break away from the mental models that have led us here, just catering to the enthusiast, and begin to build an industry that is more approachable. I read an article in the Washington Post today that was telling the story of a college that required students with a BMI or over 30 to attend a "Fitness for Life Class" prior to graduation. That's progressive thinking, send the fat kids to gym class! We need to prove that our product is stable,(doors stay open, associating with other credible institutions) and our products are reliable and predictable. We need to see that the pessimistic, conservatives that make up the late majority (we'll probably have a few from that college) can see real return-on-investment.
These are the kinds of things we think about at ViA Performance Systems and you see in action at Lemonade Neighborhood Fitness. When I opened Lemonade, I wasn't looking for the next big thing that would draw in the enthusiast from the facilities next door. I asked "what are the basics that most people need in order to more effectively enjoy the life they're given." I'm proud to say that our clientèle is just that! We have a new video up on the Lemonade site http://bit.ly/9qpo2m titled People and Programs. You can also see it athttp://bit.ly/cHuG2Q on YouTube. I'd love to get you feedback because I know, me and anyone else, is smarter than me!
Thanks,
Don
In the technology development, marketing and adoption life cycle, a standard was introduced in 1991 by author Geoffrey Moore in his book"Crossing The Chasm." Moore's work defines a technology product adoption model where new products are purchased initially by "innovators"and "visionaries." This group of enthusiast make up the "early market." As a technology is brought from idea to early market, typically lots of "features" are hung on the product from the advice and feedback of early adopters and are included to create a product that appeals to even more consumers. The challenge is that in Moore's model, lying between the early adopters and the next group, the early majority, a chasm appears. The early adopters are consumers who are described as "enthusiasts" and "visionaries." The next stage, Early Majority are described as "pragmatists. " Even more daunting, the next groups, Late Majority and Laggeds are described as conservatives and skeptics. The kind of thinking that appeals to the early adopters WILL NOT appeal to the Early Majority. But the reward to companies and industries for crossing the chasm is that more than 70% of the market, early and late majority, and laggards, lie on the other side of the chasm. Companies must change the way they think to effectively move from the enthusiast to the larger majority of the market.
On page 2 of the FOFWP three key challenges are identified from the research: 1. How do we remain relevant among the "converted" consumers(read enthusiasts). 2. Can we improve our offer to those who enjoy fitness but don't like going to the gym (pragmatists?). 3. How do we keep the industry fresh, relevant and competitive in the decades ahead..." On page 1 the authors point out that "17% of adults belong to health clubs in any single country, and market penetration of10.5% is enough to be among the top ten of all countries." When you look at this data graphically, our industry is in the "early adopter" stage of the life cycle model. It seems that we're peering over a chasm at the majority of our potential customers. Trying to light a rocket under the same thinking that brought us to this point won't be enough to get us across. Fitness providers have to change the way they think!
What do the following have in common? Golds Gym and Apple? YMCA and Google? Personal Trainers and Technology Enthusiasts? Jocks and Geeks? Until now, they've had very little in common only appearing together as ends of a comparative spectrum. But our industry is dominated by brands who cater to early adopters like jocks, personal trainers and fitness enthusiast. To date we've felt progressive stuffing some basic off-the-shelf consumer technology into our current offerings. I call that putting lipstick on a pig. As we examine our futures, we need to break away from the mental models that have led us here, just catering to the enthusiast, and begin to build an industry that is more approachable. I read an article in the Washington Post today that was telling the story of a college that required students with a BMI or over 30 to attend a "Fitness for Life Class" prior to graduation. That's progressive thinking, send the fat kids to gym class! We need to prove that our product is stable,(doors stay open, associating with other credible institutions) and our products are reliable and predictable. We need to see that the pessimistic, conservatives that make up the late majority (we'll probably have a few from that college) can see real return-on-investment.
These are the kinds of things we think about at ViA Performance Systems and you see in action at Lemonade Neighborhood Fitness. When I opened Lemonade, I wasn't looking for the next big thing that would draw in the enthusiast from the facilities next door. I asked "what are the basics that most people need in order to more effectively enjoy the life they're given." I'm proud to say that our clientèle is just that! We have a new video up on the Lemonade site http://bit.ly/9qpo2m titled People and Programs. You can also see it athttp://bit.ly/cHuG2Q on YouTube. I'd love to get you feedback because I know, me and anyone else, is smarter than me!
Thanks,
Don

Hello Mox,
The nature of industry has changed and we need to learn as we go which is reactionary. We need better action perspectives that anticipate outcomes. Hope technology can provide direction and ability to advance the thinking in United States.
Thanks look forward to next blog,
M
Reply to this
Moving consumers from innovators to early majority requires a few well-known steps:
1) Constant education to the potential consumer;
2) Customer service bar none;
3) Long term commitment and patience;
4) Strong value-added proposition - or two!
The fight against obesity has become overexposed in the media. The symptoms of poor lifestyles were beaten to death while the causes went by fairly unnoticed. The campaign against smoking is an excellent model in intensity and duration.
If one can find the trigger to personal intrinsic motivation rather than external factors forcing participation to healthy lifestyles, the battle is won!
Reply to this
Hi Don...Great article! I never thought of the fitness industry from that perspective, but you are absolutely correct that we are on the edge of a Chasm - looking over the edge - peering at the majority of our potential customers while catering to the early adoptors. Based on the new video on your web site I can see you are beginning to evolve a system that just might reel in the conservative majority...John
Reply to this
A great way to apply Moore's model to the fitness industry. It's too bad fitness and health is something we have to adopt rather than having a healthy lifestyle be part of modern society.
Just for the record to credit Ohio State, Geoffory Moore used the work of Everett Rogers (Ohio State) about adopting innovations and ideas. Rogers coined the terms innovators and early adopters. He did the first research about the subject and published in 1962.
Thanks for the insight Don!
Reply to this